Class CreateCorrelationCaseSynchronizationActionType

java.lang.Object
com.evolveum.midpoint.prism.impl.binding.AbstractMutableContainerable
com.evolveum.midpoint.xml.ns._public.common.common_3.AbstractSynchronizationActionType
com.evolveum.midpoint.xml.ns._public.common.common_3.CreateCorrelationCaseSynchronizationActionType
All Implemented Interfaces:
Containerable, Freezable, com.evolveum.midpoint.prism.impl.binding.ContainerablePrismBinding, DebugDumpable, Serializable, Cloneable

public class CreateCorrelationCaseSynchronizationActionType extends AbstractSynchronizationActionType
Creates (or updates) a correlation case for resource object in "disputed" synchronization state, i.e. one whose owner cannot be reliably determined. TODO Is it OK that correlation case is updated only when this action is configured? Shouldn't that be automatic (if the situation is DISPUTED, and a case already exists)?
See Also: